Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Canadian Gun Rights Groups Condemn RCMP Letter

Monday, August 10, 2020

Canadian Gun Rights Groups Condemn RCMP Letter

Gun rights groups like the Canadian Shooting Sports Association (CSSA), the National Firearms Association (NFA), and firearm owners across Canada continue to expose new problems with the “assault weapon”ban imposed by Trudeau’s Liberal government on May 1, 2020. 

Readers will recall that more than 1,500 firearms and devices (as well as present and future “variants”) became reclassified as “prohibited”in Canada, through regulations that took effect immediately. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau explained that the change in the law was intended to ban “military grade assault weapons,”an undefined term which he said meant guns “designed for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time.”At the same time, Bill Blair, the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, assured Canada’s hunters, farmers, and target shooters “that nothing that we are doing today or will do in the future is intended to interfere”with their legitimate and responsible activities.

Although sales, transfers, use, and transport of the newly prohibited guns and devices became generally illegal as of May 1, persons in otherwise lawful possession have until April 30, 2022 to deactivate or destroy the firearm or device, deliver it to “a police officer for destruction or other disposal,”or legally export it.

While the government has promised “fair compensation”for this government-mandated loss, the details of this program have yet to be released.

The most recent snafu arises out of a form letter that gun owners have reported receiving in the mail. These unsigned letters, sent from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to owners of firearms, contain the following: “Certain restricted firearms which were registered to you have been affected by the recent regulatory amendments. These firearms, listed below, are now classified as prohibited and the previous registration certificates are automatically nullified and are therefore no longer valid but should be retained as a historical registration record.” 

Under the relevant law, s. 72 of the Firearms Act–which uses the term “revocation”–a government official seeking to revoke a firearm registration certificate must comply with certain procedural and substantive requirements. The notice of the decision must be made “in the prescribed form,”it must include “reasons for the decision disclosing the nature of the information relied on for the decision”(unless the disclosure would endanger any person), it must be accompanied by a copy of sections 74 to 81 of the Act (outlining the process for a court review and appeals). The notice “must specify a reasonable period during which the …holder of the registration certificate may deliver to a peace officer or a firearms officer or a chief firearms officer or otherwise lawfully dispose of the firearm to which the registration certificate relates,”which period is tolled until after any related court proceedings are concluded. A regulation further requires that the notice be personally delivered, sent by registered mail or courier, or “transmitted by electronic means that can produce a paper record.”

The letters do not appear to meet these statutory and regulatory criteria, which may be why the letters refer to registration certificates being “nullified”instead of “revoked.”Indeed, the CSSA speculated that the objective of the letters may be a “fishing expedition,”to smoke out information about “non-restricted”firearms now reclassified as “prohibited”and held by law-abiding gun owners, who contact the RCMP on receipt of an obscurely worded “nullification”notice. (Unlike “restricted”and “prohibited”guns,”non-restricted”firearms do not have to be registered.)

Predictably, a barrage of questions about the purpose and effect of these notifications resulted. One example was a letter to Minister Bill Blair from Member of Parliament Bob Zimmer (Prince George-Peace River-Northern Rockies) who asked, among other things, why the RCMP was “sending a letter to firearms owners that could be confused as a revocation letter.”

On July 31, the RCMP website was updated to include a statement titled “Important Notice.”It reads, in part:

…a letter was recently sent out to individuals/businesses to inform them that their previously registered restricted firearms are now prohibited and their registration certificates became nullified. This nullification is the result of the legislative change to the Criminal Code Regulations and not the result of any decision by the Registrar to revoke the registration certificates under the Firearms Act. Accordingly, the letter is not a Firearm Registration Certificate Revocation Notice. The Amnesty Order protects owners who held a valid registration certificate for the newly prohibited firearms on April 30th, 2020. (Emphasis added.) 

Cynical gun owners in Canada may well be excused for viewing this as another shady attempt by the Liberals and government agencies to mislead the public about the “assault weapons”ban, following, as it does, the recent interpretation of “variant by the RCMP to justify adding over 1,000 guns, not directly listed in the regulation, as “prohibited”firearms. 

NFA president Sheldon Clare describes the Liberal gun ban as “the greatest threat to firearm ownership that I have seen. Americans should be very concerned about these failed Canadian experiments to take away peoples’rights being replicated in the United States.”

TRENDING NOW
Gun Control May be Wasting Away, But Not Because of COVID

News  

Monday, October 19, 2020

Gun Control May be Wasting Away, But Not Because of COVID

A recent article on a gun control news site laments that the COVID-19 pandemic has thwarted ballot initiatives to expand gun bans and restrictions. Initiatives in Florida, Oklahoma, Ohio and Oregon have stalled, allegedly due to the ...

Anti-Gun Organization Prepared to Launch National Group of Gun Owners Who Apparently Don’t Like Guns

News  

Monday, October 19, 2020

Anti-Gun Organization Prepared to Launch National Group of Gun Owners Who Apparently Don’t Like Guns

Yes, that title doesn’t make much sense, but neither does a group that promotes banning firearms starting a national organization called Gun Owners for Safety. Nonetheless, The Hill recently reported that the anti-gun group Giffords is doing just ...

Anti-gun Politicians Seek to Tax Your Second Amendment Rights Into Oblivion

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Anti-gun Politicians Seek to Tax Your Second Amendment Rights Into Oblivion

In 1819, Chief Justice John Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court famously wrote:  “the power to tax involves the power to destroy ….”

Law Professors Make Case for Second Amendment Rights in Uncertain Times

News  

Monday, October 19, 2020

Law Professors Make Case for Second Amendment Rights in Uncertain Times

Americans have made clear that they value their Second Amendment rights, especially during uncertain times. Faced with the COVID-19 pandemic and then widespread civil unrest, Americans have bought firearms in record numbers. Through September, the FBI ...

Montana: Californian-funded Fake Hunting Group Lies About Steve Bullock’s Anti-gun Record

News  

Monday, October 12, 2020

Montana: Californian-funded Fake Hunting Group Lies About Steve Bullock’s Anti-gun Record

Montana gun owners have been subjected to an abundance of lies this election season. Leading the misinformation campaign is fake hunting group Montana Hunters & Anglers Leadership Fund. Bankrolled by a wealthy San Francisco Bay ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Joe Biden Told Voters the Second Amendment DOES NOT Protect an Individual Right

News  

Monday, September 21, 2020

Joe Biden Told Voters the Second Amendment DOES NOT Protect an Individual Right

During a September 2019 “townhall” hosted by New Hampshire ABC affiliate WMUR, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden made clear that he does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms and ...

NRA Victory in Washington

Tuesday, October 20, 2020

NRA Victory in Washington

It’s rare that gun owners have something to celebrate in the Emerald City. But on Monday, the Washington Court of Appeals ruled in favor of an NRA suit on behalf of Seattle gun owners. 

Please Urge the Department of Justice to Rein in ATF's Arbitrary Determination on "Honey Badger" Pistol

News  

Monday, October 12, 2020

Please Urge the Department of Justice to Rein in ATF's Arbitrary Determination on "Honey Badger" Pistol

As we reported last week, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) recently informed firearm manufacturer Q, LLC that, in ATF’s view, Q’s “Honey Badger” pistol with stabilizing brace is actually a short-barreled rifle and ...

Judge Barrett Picks Second Amendment Case as Her “Most Significant” Ruling

News  

Monday, October 12, 2020

Judge Barrett Picks Second Amendment Case as Her “Most Significant” Ruling

The confirmation hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, are due to begin on October 12th before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.